 |
| icon of Christ the Teacher |
The ancient world was evangelised, not by professional missionaries, but by martyrs. Large parts of Europe were successfully evangelised by monks whose first concern was not to preach but to live the Faith. Thus, the first thing that St Boniface and his companions did on arriving in Germany was not to seek the great centres of population in order to preach to a greater number of people: they sought out some isolated marsh land in a place called Fulda so that they could seek God without distraction. Then, having provided for their principal concern, they were free to send individual monks and small groups out to evangelise while the rest worked and prayed in the silence of the cloister. It was not only cenobitic monks who preached: there were also hermits who spent much time trying to be alone with God and thus made very effective missionaries. Both monks and martyrs went out of their way to live the Gospel in order to preach it.
St Francis may have said that Christians have the obligation to preach the Gospel all the time and, when necessary, with words. Certainly, he made an impact with his way of life, radically following the Gospel, and only then, when people were curious, he began to preach. Blessed Charles de Foucauld also said that we must cry out the Gospel with our lives. In fact, we cannot give what we haven't got; and our own life of conversion embeds our message in the real world, turning theory into concrete, everyday practice. One of the primary functions of the body of Christ that we became when we entered the eucharistic community by baptism is to make Christ and his Gospel visible to the world. We do this by the Christian quality of our love, and that is determined by the depth of our conversion in humble obedience.
What is the New Evangelisation ?
my source: Diocese of Shrewsbury Webpage
An address by Monsignor Philip Egan, former episcopal vicar for the New Evangelisation of the Diocese of Shrewsbury
Let us begin with some thoughts on what we mean by the expression “new evangelisation“.
We are doubtless all familiar with the term ‘evangelisation’, which comes from Greek and means, ‘to announce Good News’ or ‘glad tidings’. It is what we find referred to in St Mark’s Gospel, for example: “After John was put in prison, Jesus went into Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God. ‘The time has come,’ he said. ‘The kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe the good news!’” (1:14-15).
It is interesting to note that non-Roman Catholics tend to use term ‘evangelism‘, but this usually refers to specific acts of Christian witness. The Roman Catholic term ‘evangelisation’ (used now by some non-Roman Catholics) includes specific acts of witness, but is in fact much broader.
It is a modern term. Pre-Vatican II circles spoke of mission and ‘missiology’ (the theology of mission). Mission was chiefly seen as something taking place oversees, the bringing of the Gospel to native peoples.
In Vatican II itself, the word ‘evangelisation’ not used, but it did come into widespread use shortly afterwards. The Council’s Decree on Missionary Activity of Church Ad Gentes (#2) spoke of mission as being rooted — not in us and our activity — but in the Blessed Trinity Itself: in the Father’s sending of his Son and the sending of the Holy Spirit. The Church was thus seen to be ‘by its very nature missionary’, and ‘in mission’ on all continents.
In 1974, a Synod of Bishops met to discuss evangelisation, and in his Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Nuntiandi (1975), Paul VI famously said:
“The Church exists in order to evangelise,
that is, to preach and teach, to be the channel of the gift of grace” (EN # 14).
In other words, evangelisation is now seen as belonging to the very nature of the Church. The very reason for her existence in history and in cultures is to spread the Good News of Jesus Christ. Her mission comes from God, who is himself ‘on mission’. So the Church’s mission is a sharing in God’s Trinitarian mission that is ongoing in every time and every place.
The term evangelisation is a rich and dense. Its meaning includes many things:
The primary or basic proclamation of the Gospel, the kerygma: ‘Christ has died, Christ is risen, Christ will come again’;
Catechesis and apologetics;
The specific preparation for the reception of the Sacraments of Christian Initiation;
Mystagogia, or the ongoing conversion though the preaching, teaching and deepening formation in the faith throughout a person’s Christian life and faith-journey.
The living out of the faith in one’s prayer, liturgical worship, and moral life.
In 1984, the Secretariat for Non-Christians issued a document entitled, ‘The Attitude of the Church to Followers of Other Religions’. It suggests 5 essential components to evangelisation (# 13), all of which together form a kind of ascending order and unified structure:
The living of one’s own witness as Christ’s disciple, even inadequately;
Concrete commitment in the service of the poor and needy in society;
Liturgical and contemplative prayer for the outpouring of the Holy Spirit;
Entrance into inter-religious dialogue with others “in order to walk together toward truth and to work together in projects of common concern” ;
The explicit proclamation of the Person, Life, teachings and deeds of Jesus Christ, with the aim of drawing others into that mystery.
In other words: It may be said that evangelisation is everything the Church is and does. This ranges from simply being present and witnessing to a holy life, to explicitly proclaiming Jesus Christ and his Gospel. For the Church, evangelisation is not one activity among many. It is the very essence of her nature.
During the papacy of Paul VI, the Church began to reach a deeper and richer awareness of culture. It was seen that, in order to proclaim the Gospel effectively, the Church must understand not only the culture(s) in which she preaches, but also her own culture. To evangelise, we need to ‘in-culturate’ the Gospel, meaning that we need to express it in terms appropriate to each particular culture. Cardinal Ratzinger was later to describe that task as being the ‘inter-culturation’ of the Gospel — a dialogue of cultures — since the Church herself has a culture and she seeks to create a culture, Christian culture. This is sometimes called ‘contextualisation’ or contextual theology.
In part, these considerations were driven by a growing concern about the situation of the Church in those countries of ancient Christian origin in the West, which were now facing widespread de-Christianisation and secularisation, with the attendant loss of Catholic faith and practice. Interestingly, as far back in 1943, Henri Godin and Yves Daniel had published a dramatic book, called La France, Pays de Mission? (France, a Mission Country?). By the 1980s, it was increasingly evident that in the whole of Europe, the Church was becoming a minority.
These concerns came to the fore during the pontificate of Pope John Paul II. In 1983, he explicitly spoke of the need for a new evangelisation, which he described as being “new in its ardour, new in its methods and new in its expression”. The implication was that the usual or ‘classic’ evangelisation was not working; something new was called for. From then on, the term New Evangelisation, as a specific theological term and reality, gained currency and appeared more frequently in documents, especially in preparation for the Jubilee Year, 2000.
The key texts in which reference to New Evangelisation appears are:
1990 John Paul II’s missionary encyclical, Redemptoris Missio
1997 The Vatican Congregation for the Clergy’s, General Directory for Catechesis
2001 John Paul II’s Apostolic Letter, Novo Millennio Ineunte
In Redemptoris Missio, John Paul II explores three contexts in which the Church finds herself today, and he gives the modalities of evangelisation needed for each one:
Persons and contexts where the Gospel has not been announced. What is needed is primary proclamation, the basic communication of the Gospel.
Persons and contexts where the faith is flourishing and vigorous. What is needed is the on-going pastoral care of the faithful.
Persons in intermediate situations: countries like our own of ancient Christian origin, where people have been baptized; are of good will; are perhaps connected with us through, say, the school, but are either no longer (or maybe are not yet) in a real, living relationship with Christ, or have drifted from the practice of faith. What is needed there is New Evangelisation.
Of course, as the 1997 General Directory for Catechesis added, these socio-religious situations can overlap. “In many of the great cities, for example, a situation requiring missio ad gentes can coexist with one which requires new evangelisation… The boundaries between pastoral care of the faithful, new evangelisation and specific missionary activity are not always clearly definable” (GDC # 59).
But essentially, it may be said that New Evangelisation is needed:
– in those situations, contexts and cultures in which many are baptised but few practice,
– where people have drifted and lapsed, or
– have no real, personal and dynamic relationship with Christ and his Church.
This is something Pope Benedict XVI has developed further. In the year 2000, the then Cardinal Ratzinger in an Address to Catechists said this:
“We can see a progressive process of de-Christianisation and a loss of essential human values, which is worrisome. A large part of today’s humanity does not find the Gospel in the usual evangelisation of the Church…
This is why we are searching for… a new evangelisation, capable of being heard by that world that does not find access to “classic” evangelisation.
Everyone needs the Gospel; the Gospel is destined to all and not only to a specific circle and this is why we are obliged to look for new ways of bringing the Gospel to all.”
His thinking has developed further since becoming pope, especially in view of the forthcoming 2012 Year of Faith.
In 2010, Benedict XVI established a Pontifical Council for New Evangelisation. Recently, he announced that the topic for the 2012 Synod of Bishops: “The New Evangelisation for the Transmission of the Christian Faith”. As for all Synods, there exists a draft preparatory document called the lineamenta. What is said at this Synod and the subsequent papal document will be absolutely determinative for our diocesan Department of New Evangelisation.
Finally, let me say what I believe the term New Evangelisation means.
The definition of New Evangelisation in Magisterial documents is still a bit ‘fluid’. We can say is that it is not a programme, as John Paul II himself emphasised in Novo Millennio Ineunte (#29):
“We are certainly not seduced by the naive expectation that — faced with the great challenges of our time — we shall find some magic formula. No, we shall not be saved by a formula but by a Person, and the assurance which he gives us: ‘I am with you’!
It is not therefore a matter of inventing a “new programme”. The programme already exists: it is the plan found in the Gospel and in the living Tradition, it is the same as ever. Ultimately, it has its centre in Christ himself, who is to be known, loved and imitated, so that in him we may live the life of the Trinity, and with him transform history until its fulfilment in the heavenly Jerusalem.
This is a programme which does not change with shifts of times and cultures, even though it takes account of time and culture for the sake of true dialogue and effective communication. This programme for all times is our programme for the Third Millennium. But it must be translated into pastoral initiatives adapted to the circumstances.”
Avery Dulles S.J. (a theologian who died in 2008) once remarked that the most significant shift that has occurred in the Church since Vatican II is the shift from a static, institutional model of being Church to an ‘evangelistic self-understanding.’ Whilst journalists and others often apply political categories to the Church — left-wing/right wing, conservative/progressive, etc. — others propose that the real division today is between ecclesiastics and evangelisers. In other words, between those who focus mainly on the institution, and those who focus mainly on the Person of Christ.
This division is evident in the three key features of New Evangelisation.
1. New Evangelisation calls for a new ardour.
John Paul II said we need an evangelisation that is ‘new in its ardour, new in its methods and new in its expression’. New Evangelisation is therefore about every Christian deepening his or her own faith, hope and love, and becoming more fired up with a new ardour, a real love for Christ and his Church. Filled with such enthusiasm, ‘fire in the belly’, a personal-passionate love, one naturally and instinctively reaches out to draw others in.
2. New Evangelisation is Christo-centric rather than ecclesio-centric.
It is basic, evangelical teaching and preaching focused on the Person of Christ and on discipleship of him (within his Body, the Church, of course). It is not ecclesio-centric, the aim is neither to preach the Church nor to enhance the institutions of the Church.
To give an example: it is not the tired old football-match type of theology in which two teams compete for dominance: the left versus the right, battling over how far or how little there should be change in the Church or in this and that practice. New Evangelisation requires a new theological approach. A good image is that of orienteering, where everyone pools unique and different gifts, talents and skills in order to work together towards a common goal.
3. New Evangelisation is thoroughly street-aware, i.e. conscious of today’s cultural context.
We are Catholics who live in a culture focused on design, media image, style and entertainment. Yet this culture is also a corrosively secular, pluralist, culture which seeks to drive religion out of the public sphere.
In this challenging context, it is imperative to underline the ‘brand’ of the Church, i.e. to be able to articulate what is distinctive about being Catholic, a faith that is utterly ancient and yet thoroughly modern and alternative. We need to witness boldly in the public domain to Christ and to that which makes us different.
At the same time, we need to make use of the new media resources and available technologies (e.g. Shrewsbury’s new diocesan website). I would say, theologically, that this means we should envisage our Catholic Tradition not as a chest of old treasures to be kept locked away or constantly paraded as in a living museum, but rather as a tool-box from which things both old and new can be brought out and pressed into service — as appropriate in different circumstances — in order to communicate the message more effectively .
These three features — new ardour, new method (Christo-centricity), and new expression (culturally conscious) — are what characterise New Evangelisation.
Posts
